The war on terror should be stopped for the benefit of humanity

Bush announcing the start of his invasion of Iraq on March 19, The United Nations has brought together the nations of the world closer than ever, and it is in the interest of every government present during the conferences to advocate their stance on their actions taken against a hostile power, which under the United Nations Charter, they should by all means have the right to do so.

We, the public, are the people whose lives are on the line in this conflict; we have a right to demand that the people acting for us make our safety a priority, and not put us in further jeopardy by making matters worse. Call in to radio and television talk shows.

Using propaganda techniques, like broadcasting American television serials which Netanyahu sees as subversive material will ultimately bring down regimes like the Ayatola regime and the Khoumeni regime in Iran. Firstly, Netanyahu pushes for the US to invade Iraq, a wish was fulfilled a short time later.

However, these political missions were not proven to be as effective as they would have hoped, in during the Bosnian War, Resolution was passed detailing that all personal in the area of Sebrenica would be under the "safe zone" with the protection from the United Nations Protection Force that would have kept them from any harm by the Bosnian Serb Army, yet, when the Bosnian Serb Army did invade the protection promised to these citizens were abandoned by the United Nations as the Protection Force failed to keep the situation under control which subsequently led to the Srebrenica genocide of muslim bosniaks.

They understand that if this terror goes unpunished, their own cities, their own citizens may be next. Consider working jointly with a local mosque or Third World community center. The War on Terror has been empirically ineffective. America must show that it will not heed the international call to stop Israel from exercising its right to defend itself.

The Israelis are responding in self-defense. We must first draw up an indictment and specify what the crimes were, calling upon all states to arrest and detain the persons named in the indictment so they can be interrogated by U.

So, what is the State Department afraid we might find if we used it to do just that? Things related and not. Eland is a graduate of Iowa State University and received an M.

Data Protection Choices

We have to apply the existing rules. Israel should not be asked to stop fighting terror and return to a negotiating table with a regime that is committed to the destruction of the Jewish State and openly embraces terror.

Access Denied

The State Department has continued to publish "Country Reports on Terrorism" every year, and was forced to include a "statistical annex" beginning with the report for A year later, she told theIndependent"This rather extraordinary war on terror, which is a phrase that all lawyers hate… is not really a war, a conflict against terror, any more than the war on obesity means that you can detain people.

We simply can no longer afford to allow this region to remain cloistered by a fanatic militancy. If the War on Terror has been even remotely successful, we would not be seeing the following news headlines: The policies adopted by the Obama administration just over the last couple of years leave no doubt that they are accelerating, not winding down, the war apparatus that has been relentlessly strengthened over the last decade.

Table at community events. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. It will arouse an immediate expectation, and demand, for spectacular military action against some easily identifiable adversary, preferably a hostile state…" In the U.

But underlying all the crimes and atrocities committed in our names is the fiction that we are at "war" with "terror", whatever that can possibly mean. If certain "security" legislation fails to make its way through the proper channels, executive orders are issued to make it a reality.

Because the impact of the attacks from the Islamic State were very deep, it affected many policies regarding the current ongoing refugee crisis in Europe, the national security policies of France and many other countries, and became the deadliest attack on France since the Second World War.

That will only encourage more terror. They all had propaganda machines. The grievance of terrorists can never be redressed through diplomacy.

Charter was intended to exclude. Obama did have a part-time job as a lecturer teaching 3 two-hour seminars per year at the University of Chicago in a program that brought politicians and other prominent people into the law school to give students a taste of the "real world.

Israel must establish physical barriers separating the main Palestinian population centers from Israeli towns and cities to prevent any residual terrorists from reaching Israel.

We all want the most effective possible course for stopping terrorism.Review opinions on the online debate Resolved: The US should abandon the War on Terror. The same civic organizations that should play a role in dealing with the physical aftermath of an attack should play a role now in preparing for the political aftermath.

This would be a boon to our political well-being, whether the attack ever comes or not. America's military adventures have fueled a global explosion of terrorism and a historic breakdown of law and order.

Twelve years into America's "war on terror," it is time to admit that it has failed catastrophically, unleashing violence, war and instability in an "arc of terror" stretching from West Africa to the Himalayas and beyond.

The humanity in the 21st century faces the biggest threat from the phenomenon of TERRORISM. Terrorism is the unlawful use of force and violence against the people and the property aimed at coercing the legitimate government of the day.

Yes, the United States most definitely should end the War on Terror. The United States needs to focus more on the problems faced by the American people and stop the.

A cost-benefit analysis should be conducted to evaluate the grounds of this war. The fear created has to be addressed (Chernus, ).

10 Things You Can Do to Prevent War

World governing bodies on human rights have been focusing on addressing this issue.

The war on terror should be stopped for the benefit of humanity
Rated 4/5 based on 9 review