Nike sustainable business report

Value, long-term horizon, research analyst, contrarian Summary In this article, I am going to compare Nike, adidas and Under Armour from the perspective of a long-term investor.

NIKE, Inc. FY14/15 Sustainable Business Report

This is the most important piece of information we should focus on. Let me explain this point better. Finally, the means by which an SEV system can create a competitive advantage are investigated.

Competitive Advantages When assessing the long-term prospects of a company is necessary to verify whether the company has some kind of competitive advantage that can protect its nike sustainable business report against competition and, therefore, give the company nike sustainable business report possibility to exploit growth opportunities in its industry without being overwhelmed by the competition.

Nike is the only Nike we will see in the future, and investors should never confuse temporary fashion trends with long-term growth trajectories. As a result, the concept of monitoring is significantly extended, while also considering how different stakeholders can play diverse, active roles as metrics are established, audits are conducted, and information is validated.

I confirm all my previous positions, and in particular: Many now even call for an overhaul of this nike sustainable business report model to become more cyclical and circular, using concepts like cradle-to-cradle or circular economy thinking. I am long NKE with a medium-long term horizon.

Fashion trends helped adidas gain market share at the expense of Nike, and there was no competitive advantage that put adidas ahead of the American competitor. Technological and social-cultural developments will continue to drive innovation but the world changing innovators of tomorrow will look to nature for inspiration too.

I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Today, natural systems are becoming an equally valuable source of inspiration, via concepts like biomimicry, cradle-to-cradle, ecological design, industrial ecology, and closed loop manufacturing — all using nature as their model, measure, and mentor.

Innovators are known to thrive on constraints and sustainability is re-drawing the traditional boundaries of innovation. Zero waste from contracted footwear manufacturing sent to landfill or incineration without energy recovery.

I calculated the YoY difference in search to neutralize seasonal effects, and I applied an 8-week moving average to smooth the trend and make it easily visible. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. You will get my articles as soon as they are published. In other words, Nike has a higher efficiency and can bear higher costs compared to its main competitors.

One of the most important factors is brand power. Superior performance with a lower environmental impact — 98 percent of new footwear scored silver or better on our product sustainability indices, 80 percent of new apparel scored bronze or better and the use of environmentally preferred materials increased overall.


I think the company will also find it difficult to gain market share outside the United States, due to the limited reach of its marketing investments. If you are interested in having access to my best long and short ideas in the consumer industry, please consider joining Consumer Alpha.

Nonetheless, Nike is the only brand in the group that is showing a stable trend since the beginning of the year, while Under Armour has stabilized a bit only starting from April and adidas is falling extremely fast. However this is framed, the innovation system widens when innovating for sustainability.

These dimensions characterize how supply chain processes might identify key measures, collect and process data, and finally, verify materiality, reliability and accuracy of any data and resulting information. To date, sustainable supply chain management research has largely focused on monitoring as a self-managed set of narrowly defined evaluative activities employed by firms to provide stakeholder accountability.

Innovators traditionally design for systems to source, produce, sell, and use their products or services, making them cheaper to make, easier to sell, or better to use.

Sustainability innovators design for a wider system than just make, use, dispose.

Nike Vs. Adidas Vs. Under Armour - An Update

We have developed ever more sophisticated research techniques to glean insights ethnography, focus groups, co-creation, video diaries, etc. The achievements highlighted in this report include: A few months ago, I wrote down some of my thoughts on these three companies and shared my view that only Nike NKE was a compelling medium-long term investment in the group.

At its core, the construct of sustainable evaluation and verification SEV captures three interrelated dimensions: Nonetheless, there are certain characteristics that actually limit competition in comparison to the crowded and fragmented apparel market, giving some protection to sportswear brands with a solid following and a good market share.

Besides the obvious scale advantage that gives Nike the possibility to leverage some fixed costs better than its competitors, there is also a strong lead in terms of marketing spending that has built a good competitive advantage for Nike.

Sustainable innovation also does this, but adds social and environmental factors too. I am not receiving compensation for it other than from Seeking Alpha. Collected from bakeries, delis, and sandwich makers close to the brewery, breadcrumbs are used as an essential ingredient for brewing the beer.

I think investors should remain realistic and consider the different contexts. Sustainability innovators look wider for their insights, delivering benefits to a broader set of stakeholders than consumers and customers alone.

Disagree with this article? Sustainable innovation looks further up- and downstream to a wider set of lifecycle stages — considering resource extraction, distribution, and waste and disposal issues too. Nike is by far the most popular brand, thanks to its strong leadership in North America, although its popularity is basically equivalent to adidas in the rest of the world.metrics originally reported in NIKE’s FY14/15 Sustainable Business Report are restated in this report to reflect the expansion and enable comparability.

This report reflects an evolution in our approach to reporting, allowing us to focus on performance. To enable this change, we have. Nike FY14/15 Sustainable Business Report Review: Nike sprints ahead on environment By Elaine Cohen on Jun 23, The sporting goods behemoth gets full marks for reporting on its carbon footprint.

May 11, – Today, NIKE, Inc. shared its FY14/15 Sustainable Business Report, which details strong progress against the company’s environmental and social targets and sets a vision for a.

Sustainable innovation is a catalyst for revolutionizing the way we do business and an opportunity that's been integrated across our business in policies, processes and products.

USA's premier event on Data Ethics, Climate Action and Social Impact

We are innovating solutions that benefit athletes, the company and the world. We have also replaced solvent-based chemistry in all NIKE Brand footwear with water-based chemistry, which has reduced the use of petroleum-derived solvents in our shoe designs by 96 percent per pair since Collectively, a synthesis of related literatures indicates that a minimum of three underlying dimensions – inclusivity, scope and disclosure – collectively characterize a system or set of interdependent and sequential processes that evaluate and verify the environmental and .

Nike sustainable business report
Rated 4/5 based on 88 review